Studi Evaluatif Berbasis Model Diskrepansi Terhadap Implementasi Asesmen Autentik Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Kristen Kelas Viii Di SMP Kristen Kota Kupang

Authors

  • Anita Ege Udju Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52960/m.v2i1.98

Keywords:

Authentic Assessment, Discrepancy, Evaluation

Abstract

This study aims to determine and describe the discrepancy that occurs between ideal conditions and real conditions related to the implementation of authentic assessments in Christian Religious Education subjects according to the 2013 curriculum. that the assessment carried out only focuses on results without looking at the process. The method used in this research is descriptive quantitative. The results of this study are; (1) Discrepancies at the assessment planning stage are quite wide; product assessment is classified as small; portfolio assessment is small; project assessment is small, performance assessment is small. (2) The discrepancy at the self-assessment implementation stage is quite wide; small portfolio assessment; project assessment is small; performance assessment is quite broad. (3) Discrepancy at the self-assessment reporting stage is very wide, product assessment is small, portfolio assessment is small, project assessment is small, performance assessment is quite wide. The most dominant factor causing discrepancies is the lack of training related to the implementation of authentic assessments for Christian religious education teachers.

 

References

Ajafruddin, dkk. 2015. Persepsi Guru Terhadap Penilaian Autentik pada Kurikulum 2013 di SD. Diakses pada 23 Maret 2017. Tersedia pada journal.um.ac.id

Arikunto, Suharsimi, 2014. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Dantes, Nyoman. 2012. Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Dantes, Nyoman. 2014. Landasan Pendidikan: Tinjauan dari Dimensi Makropedagogis. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Kusumastuti, Ayuk, dkk. 2016. Faktor-Faktor Penghambat Guru Dalam Melaksanakan Kurikulum 2013 pada Pembelajaran Akuntansi di SMK Negeri 3 Surakarta. Volumen 2, No 1, Maret 2016. Diakses pada 20 Maret 2017. Tersedia pada: www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id

Marhaeni, A. A. I. N dan Artini, L. P. 2015. “Asesmen Autentik dan Pendidikan Bermakna: Implementasi Kurikulum 2013” . Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, Volume 4, Nomor 1, April 2015. Diakses pada 5 Desember 2016. Tersedia pada: Ejournal. Undiksha.ac.id

Marhaeni, A. A. I. N. 2007. Asesmen Otentik dalam Rangka KTSP: Suatu Upaya Pemberdayaan Guru dan Siswa. Makalah. Disampaikan pada Pelatihan KTSP bagi Guru SMP/MTs di Kabupaten Tabanan Tanggal 10-14 September 2007.

Ruslan, dkk. 2016. Kendala Guru dalam Menerapkan Penilaian Autentik di SD Kabupaten Pidie. Volumen 1 nomoe 1, Agustus 2016. Diakses pada 27 Maret 2017. Tersedia pada: www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id.pgsd

Sutisna, Entis.2014. penilaian Autentik : dari KTSP ke Kurikulum 2013 pengalaman sebagai seorang guru, fasilitator, dan guru pendamping, makalah disampaikan dalam seminar Nasional pendidikan Matematika UPI Bandung, Bandung 27 Desember 2014

Wadsworth, Yoland.1993. Everyday Evaluation on the Run. 2nd Edition. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

Walgito, Bimo. 2010. Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-21

Issue

Section

Articles